Search This Blog

Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Extract 8

Year 2: An Eventful Year, filled with Lessons and (yet more) Humiliations. First Blossoming of Intellectual Awareness, Awareness of my Difference, Independence of Thought. The Beginning of the Apocalyptic End of all Happiness and Sanity

Having not been selected in the so-called “Independent Class” for year 2, I was put in 2E. My teacher in this class was Mrs Evans.
Mrs Evans was an old woman. She was such an old woman, in fact, that I remember her telling us, on more than one occasion, that she was “103”. I don’t think I ever quite believed this, and certainly dismissed it on reflection – although she clearly was pretty old for a teacher. Maybe 70?
 Madame Evans adored art. She was truly infatuated with art and crafts, and devoted an inordinate amount of class time to it. In hindsight, it almost seems as if we did an artistic activity every day. I know that we did have a regular routine of visiting the “Kiln” down below the playground. I think it might even have been weekly visits to the kiln – however that does make you wonder about the limits of novelty in amateur pottery manufacture. Certainly, we did do a lot of arts and craft. Indeed, from very early on in the year, arts and craft became an obsession.
In the summer holidays before the school year began, I remember that I had managed to persuade my mum to finally buy me a big set of textas. Textas were cool and super fashionable back then, and having a lot of them was a real status symbol, particularly due to the potential abundance afforded you to create highly elaborate and impressive texta guns, or texta chains (and the look of a pencil case bulging with textas was all the rage – it was a real turn-on). Unfortunately, I remember that when we all shuffled into Mrs Evans’ class for the first time, one of the first things she told us was that she did not abide textas, and instead wanted everyone to go out and buy Texta-brand “twisting crayons”. This was a massive disappointment for everyone. I seem to recall there was a huge sigh upon the announcement of the news, followed by a series of protestations.
Despite the generality of the dismay, I do believe it was more disappointing for me than anyone else, because all the hopes, dreams and fantasies that had been swirling about in my head during the prelusive weeks had been so unceremoniously crushed. What a devastating blow! I realised immediately that I would receive no boost in status from my extra textas, and would probably barely use them, leaving them to moulder at home instead. It was hard to imagine anything more tragic than that.
When we then enjoined our parents to buy the ersatz textas, we learned (with a mixture of disappointment and curiosity) that twisting crayons were these long, slender plastic implements that were not quite like a pen, a pencil or a texta. Indeed, they were a near-perfect hybrid: they vaguely resembled textas, with their bright, shiny, sleek appearance; they felt like pens, with their narrow, easily pinchable shape; and the actual imprinting substance was soft and degradable like graphite, with extra length available by the simple, mechanical process of twisting a plastic collar (a bit like sharpening a pencil).
We did an awful lot with these unusual art implements. I remember, in particular, one occasion where we had to write our name in big, “bubble letters” on a background we’d already filled in ourselves. I think it might have been an artwork that was going to be hung up as a symbol of our identity.
Now, before I go on, I’d like to make clear that I was truly abysmal at art in year 2. While I quickly rose to the top of the class academically, and established a firm and impregnable intellectual dominance, I was quite literally at the opposite extreme in the aesthetic disciplines. Yes, it was that polarised: I was king of academics and peasant of aesthetics. I liked to doodle well enough (in fact, probably more than my peers), but I was truly hopeless at any kind of structured artistic exercise.
Nowhere can this be better demonstrated than in the case of the “bubble letter” artwork. As embarrassing and probably incredible as it sounds, I had always struggled with bubble letters. Not only that, but I had been fiercely jealous of those who had the ability to emblazon their books with bubbly designs. How dexterous they were! My main problem was that I tended to misapply the rules of normal writing to bubble writing, never thinking through the schematic differences between the two typographies. For example, I know that I used to draw the two big strokes of the T when I was doing bubble Ts, even though that immediately makes it impossible to draw a normal-looking bubble T. I also used to draw the entire standard ‘e’ before trying to bubblise it, which also doesn’t work. Was it a product of low spatial cognition? I think I was just an unusual child, with a slightly weird brain. I think I have always lacked common sense to some degree. When I am assisting my dad in various menial labours around the house, for example, I often do very silly things. Moreover, I have always had the habit of forgetting to put down the objects associated with one task while starting another. Anyway, in the case of this one artwork where we had to write our name in bubble letters, I seem to recall I kept stuffing up. Not just once, but a few times. If I’m not mistaken, I think I even had to scrap my first two gos. Eventually, I think I got the bubbly T right and had everything in order until I suddenly realised that I was running out of space and would have to start drawing smaller bubble letters. In the end, my name was lopsided and deformed, with the last few letters receding dramatically and sloping downwards. Mrs Evans was very disappointed, and chastised me for my idiocy. Nobody else had failed so badly as me. I felt awful.
It is quite odd to think about the polarisation of my fortunes in that class. As well as memories of artistic failure, I have a number of memories of intellectual supremacy in 2E. Indeed, my sense of intellectual supremacy is perhaps the most salient feature of that entire year apart from my artistic nullitude. I don’t think I had viewed myself as in any way gifted before year 2, but in this unselective class, it was quite clear that I was the best from the outset (and that I should really have been one of the first picked for the “Independent class”, not omitted entirely). The dominant impression I have is of finding everything so easy. I struggled to understand why people took so long to pick up things that were, for me, essentially intuitive. I soon discovered I was peerless in mental arithmetic, despite having made no active effort to learn the times tables; I was peerless in English reading and comprehension, and began to find the slowness of others excruciating; and I also discovered that I had much more “general knowledge” – more knowledge of interesting facts, world events, culture and human psychology – than any one of my classmates. God it was boring. One example of my supremacy is in learning how to read analogue clocks. Just minutes after starting the exercise in our “Maths book” on how to read analogue clocks, I remember realising, with a surge of joy, that I now knew how to do that quintessentially mature activity of telling the time. I could now know the time without asking a parent! What a wonderful thing! By contrast, others in my class struggled badly with the exercise, and I know that some of them didn’t even learn how to read a clock by the end of the year (and beyond).
Another time, I remember a series of mums came in to help teach us to read multiple-digit numbers.[1] As soon as they arrived, everyone in the class was split up into groups of three or four, each of which was assigned a mum. I was put in a circle led by Alex Jarmyn’s mum, with three other kids whose identities I don’t remember. After we were settled, Ms Jarmyn began to present us with these green cards on which random numbers were printed. As soon as she showed us one of these cards, we were meant to read out the number. The idea was the digitude would gradually increase with every success, and the hope was that the mums might eventually get to the superhuman challenge of four or five digit cards. I was ready for the high numbers from the start. Before the class had started, I could already read two-digit, three-digit numbers and four-digit numbers with ease, and I easily recognised the conventions for reading five and six. As I demolished card after card, Ms Jarmyn began to evince increasing admiration for my abilities. Eventually, she resolved to unveil the artefact she had previously thought unattainable, the greatest challenge of all – a five-digit number. I was now the sole focus of her attention, and the other kids around me were left to sit there agog at my precocity. If I remember correctly (through the fog of time), the gargantuan number she presented me with began with “four”. Although nobody had ever asked me to say a five-digit number before, the extrapolation of the pattern from smaller digits was simple enough. I knew that the number was now referring to “40 quantities of a thousand” not “4 quantities of a thousand”, and the rest followed on easily enough. Tragically, I was frazzled by the spotlight, and I ended up starting my recitation with “Four thousand” (as opposed to “Forty-x thousand”). Although I realised my blunder immediately, I think Ms Jarmyn quickly assumed that five digits was my limit, because she quickly put away the card and pronounced our session over. Though she praised my acuity, I recall being disappointed that I had failed to demonstrate my true capacities.
Another time, I remember breaking the curve on a spelling test, which gave me a “spelling age” of 13 (which I think was the cap). I know this fact because it was mentioned in the parent-teacher interview. I also remember finding dictation a cinch.
One of the most vivid memories I have of 2E also pertains to my intellectual dominance, though not in a good way. At some point during the year, Mrs Evans recognised that it would be a good idea to give me extension exercises, and I thus began to spend increasing time segregated from the rest of the class. One of these times, something very embarrassing happened. I won’t say more here, because I wrote a third-person, Portait of the Artist-style narrative of this memory 18 months ago: 
“He was staring at Mrs Evans: she had a wrinkly, unevenly pigmented and powdery face, and colourful spectacles dangled off the chain on her reptilian neck. She was speaking to him: “Tom, do these comprehension sheets while I teach the other kids”.
“Ok,” he replied quietly as she handed them to him. He grasped them and looked down at them. He examined the first question: What does Tom want from Joe? It looked pretty easy, no problem. And he was so smart, doing these extension exercises while the other kids still had to learn – he was so much smarter than all of them. 
“Sit over there,” she said, pointing at the empty table behind him, towards which he turned and nodded in acknowledgement. “And let me know when you’re finished.”
“Ok,” he said. He turned around and started walking over towards the table. Mrs Evans then spoke, and he turned around to look at the scene behind him as he continued walking towards the desk: she was addressing the rest of the class, the dummies, all the people he was smarter than, there was Hall sitting crossleggèd on the floor, there was Jack and Jake and Harrison and Daniel and Simon and Lana Chakerian, she was not as dumb as the rest she could almost be up here coz she got the 9 × 7 = 63 quicker than him that one time when they were on the floor doing the timetables. They were all now looking upwards in obedience as she started speaking, “Pay attention everyone. Stop talking. We’re going to look at verbs again.” A low murmur persisted. “Harrison, stop talking.”
Harrison quickly turned his head to look at her.
“What did I just say?” Mrs Evans said, staring at him fiercely.
“We’re going to look at verbs again,” Harrison replied.
“You’re lucky. Now don’t talk again.”
“Ok”.
Tom turned back, sat down on the chair below him and placed the papers on the desk. He pulled the chair in as Mrs Evans continued – “We’re going to start with verbs: what’s the word that’s a little bit stronger than Good?” – the answer’s Better, that’s so easy. He started reading the text that was on the first sheet in front of him:
Jim was very angry. Lucy had said something bad about him the day before and he wanted to do the same. In the kitchen with his mum…
It was easy. Simple. He began to answer the first question. In the background the other kids answered even easier questions about grammar.
He worked diligently for a few minutes, but as he was answering the second question, he suddenly felt an overwhelming urge to pick his nose. It felt like there was a great chunk of snot just at the base of his right nostril, obstructing the passage of air. It needed to be removed. He rubbed his nose with the back of his right hand, then, after quickly looking at the rest of his class mates to check if any of them were looking, inserted his right index finger into his nose and fished it out. He looked at the piece, now stuck on his finger: it was a delicate little sliver, and of such a subtle green colour as to be almost translucent. He turned back towards the rest of the class again: Jack Vignes was staring right at him. Oh shit, he had seen. He suddenly shouted: “Eww Tom just picked his nose!” Everyone was looking at Tom now, all the girls, everyone – even Mrs Evans. It was so embarrassing. He felt his face flushing.
“I didn’t, I just rubbed it. I didn’t pick it. Like this.” He brought his finger to his nose and scratched around the entrance.
“Nah, I saw you!” Jack retorted.
Mrs Evans now loudly spoke: “Ok, let’s focus on what we’re doing again.”
Gradually everyone quietened down and turned their heads towards her. The lesson had resumed. Tom resumed writing, humiliation lingering. He no longer felt special or smart at all.”
To be honest, I can’t remember if it really was Jack Vignes who spotted me picking my nose and alerted the class. Whoever it was, though, it really was a humiliating moment. It really took me down a peg or two (despite my literal elevation above the rest of the class when it happened). It also shocked and saddened me that the other boys in the class revelled in pulling me down. It really made me feel isolated; I was truly alone.
I did pick my nose a lot as a child. It wasn’t true that I had only scratched the entrance. I still pick my nose now. I never managed to kick the habit, though I have tried a number of times. I used to think that the frequent, rather intense nosebleeds that I suffered at night as a child had something to do with my nosepicking. In retrospect, the fact they stopped even though I didn’t suggests there might have been some other cause.
I have many memories of waking up in the middle of the night with a running nose, and raising my hand to wipe away the fluid only to find that it kept flowing and that I could taste blood in my mouth. This always drove me to the bathroom to wash off my hands and try to stop the sanguinary stream. Due to the frequency of this kind of event, my old mattress developed huge, burgundy bloodstains, and my pillow (which has remained the same for more than a decade and a half) is deeply infused with plasma.
Anyhow, to return to 2E, I should say that I wasn’t totally infallible academically, and I know this because I have a memory that testifies to it. I seem to remember only one homework task from 2E. It was an exercise where we had to work out the comparatives and superlatives for a series of adjectives. If you have no idea what I’m talking about, an example is the following question:
“Happy, happier, [        ]”
This kind of thing was very easy, as you might expect, and I think I cruised through the first few examples. But suddenly, out of the blue, the word “good” appeared. It was sitting in the first row of a table, followed by two blanks. I was baffled. I had no idea what they wanted. “Gooder” and “Goodest” just did not sound right, and I had certainly never heard any adult use them before. Before I attempted any answer, I saw that the next question was just as perplexing, requesting that I fill in two blanks for the word “bad”. I had also never heard any adult say “Badder” or “Baddest” before. I tried to think of alternatives; nothing came. In the end, I decided to write the very ugly and wrong-sounding words in the spaces, while also appending a marginalium in which I explained both my confusion and my recognition that “Gooder” and “Badder” sounded wrong. Given that I could see no possible alternative, it seemed most probable to me that the exercise was flawed, and so I also wrote something to that effect in the note. It was all a very unnerving experience. I hated the feeling of not knowing.
When Mrs Evans returned the marked exercises a few days later, I remember that she spoke briefly about people “writing notes” on their paper. She said that it was nice to read but unnecessary, or something like that. The important point is that I hadn’t got 100% on the exercise. Apparently, “better” and “best” were regarded as the correct extensions of “good”, and “worse” and “worst” were the correct extensions of “bad”. Although I was happy to concede that “Gooder” and “Badder” were incorrect responses, I still thought that was a little dodgy. Even now, I think that’s a touch dodgy. Like, sure, those words seem to work pretty well together, but I don’t think “Good” and “Better” are as semantically unified as “Happy” and “Happier”. “John is good” and “John is better than Nancy” have very different implications for John. The first is most likely a moral statement, whereas the second is most likely not. “Bad, worse” is just as dodgy, if not more. “John is bad” or “John’s a bad man” do not compare with “John is worse than Bob” or “John is a worse man than Bob”. The most natural interpretation of the first two claims is that they are kind of moral statements of some kind, perhaps even eroticised, raunchy ones (as in “Bad to the bone”, “Bad boy” etc). The most natural interpretation of the first comparative claim is that it is a statement of differing competence. And the most natural interpretation of the second comparative claim is that it is a moral statement, but not one that could be used in the same intriguing way as “John’s a bad man”.  
Anyway, the fact remains that I should have been smart enough to realise what they were after.
To return to Mrs Evans’ obsession with art, some of the other artistic projects we did over the course of the year were:
·         Painting a flower pot for father’s day. My flower pot ended up being painted in green and white stripes on account of my obsession with this World Cup 2002 soccer game I had been playing on our Windows 98 family computer, which I had won with the Republic of Ireland. I don’t know why I chose to play with the Republic of Ireland, given they were pretty average, but as I progressed through the tournament I remember my affection for the nation and its people grew exponentially. Incidentally, one of the most devastating moments in my life occurred when, after a holiday or something, I opened up the disc drawer on the tower of the computer to find that the disc had grown some kind of blotchy white mould on its underside (the legible side) and was no longer playable.  Words cannot express the despair I felt when I made this discovery.
·         Painting a Monet-inspired, florid vista with water colours on a little square of canvas. I think this was one of my only artistic successes in 2E. In contrast to everything else, I wasn’t terrible at dabbing the canvas with red paint to crudely simulate the look of a field of flowers.
·         Creating a little colourful coaster out of clay and glazes. As aforementioned, we did visit the kiln quite frequently and no doubt made a few other things that I’ve forgotten. This coaster had painted on it a picture of a house. I remember I was never sure whether the one I ended up receiving back was mine, because I had painted my initials, TA, on the back of mine and Alexandra Thompson had painted her initials, AT, on the back of hers, and for some reason it was ambiguous which was which (perhaps because one set of initials was inverted relative to the face of the coaster). Anyhow, I got something back which I still have.  
One other memory I have of Mrs Evans was that she was very proud of her son called (I think) James, who played Rugby at a relatively high level. I think she alluded to his prowess on the rugby field on more than one occasion, and there was a photo near her desk of him in a maul or something.
Another memory I have is of Samuel Dawson calling out in class that something or other “sucks”, and Mrs Evans suddenly pronouncing her perplexity at the usage.
“Why does that suck? You suck a lollipop. That’s what the word means.”
I think this response produced giggles among the boys, who clearly understood (to varying extents) the etymology of “suck” in the pejorative, intransitive sense. I did not join in the laugh, and was instead appalled that it was happening. It was the height of impertinence – not to say savagery – to implicate our dear old teacher in depravity of that sort. I wasn’t sure if Mrs Evans realised the more debauched connotations or not, but the situation disturbed me either way. Such disrespect.

Also, to skip ahead to the end of year 2, I won the Academic Excellence medal for 2E at Presentation Day. While it’s not a surprise given what I’ve described, I thought I’d mention it because it was very gratifying and important to me at the time. 

Socially, year 2 was a pretty bad year for me. I had friends, but I also saw for the first time the significance of evolutionary psychology – in particular, the truth that our social hierarchies are still often very primitive and that human chauvinism with respect to evolution is very much a mistaken attitude. What on earth do I mean by that? Well, I’ll explain.
Since I was a boy (and not Edward Poate), I hung out with the boys. Since I was in 2E and had not forged any really strong relationships with anyone in the other year 2 class, I hung out specifically with boys from 2E.
I don’t think it took me too long in year 2 to become aware of the importance of masculinity, swagger and brash confidence, and the inevitability of one’s place in the hierarchy based on those traits. Jake Pearce was essentially the alpha male of our year. He was an incredibly stupid boy who had repeated year 2 presumably because of his stupidity. But the real distinguishing feature of Jake Pearce was not his stupidity (since there were equally stupid people in 2E), but his masculinity. He was olive-skinned and conspicuously handsome; his name was awesome and desirable, with its jagged, harsh, ruthless quality; he rarely or never smiled, and had little or no sense of humour; and he was brooding, muscular and athletic. All the signs of highly elevated testosterone levels were there, at the ripe old age of eight. Crucially, to everyone in our year except me, this smouldering masculinity was magnetic. He was like some kind of immense celestial body, pulling all smaller objects into his gravitational field. Only my intelligence and philosophical genius had the power to resist this force. I am not even exaggerating. This guy’s manliness truly did have an inexorable impact on everyone else, as if the dynamic was literally nature taking its course, as fundamental as the sun rising in the morning or water flowing in a river. Indeed, I quickly did file it away as a law of nature, formulated in the following form: most men gravitate towards the alpha male, and immediately begin to grovel. It is an axiom that has been continuously confirmed ever since. I try to ignore everyone who proves it, though unfortunately that means my pool of possible friends is only 5-10% of the male population, excluding the alpha males themselves (because they are still more repulsive than any of their acolytes).
Of course, I have been simplifying the social dynamics of 2E a little. This is not to say that any of that was false, just that the hierarchy was more complex than a monarchy, with Jake Pearce the king and everyone else his subjects and serfs. Instead, there were discernible levels. There were several people also right near the top of the hierarchy, there were several social climbers and desperadoes, and there were a few at the bottom. Personally, I tried to avoid the hierarchies altogether, and I don’t think I ever talked to Jake Pearce. I guess this meant I was on my own level – alienated intellectual. I’m not entirely sure about the evolution of the friend groups from 2E over the year, although I do remember some details.
One of the reasons my previous picture of the social arrangements was simplistic is that there was never one big friend group incorporating every boy in our class. Instead, I think the system of groups was fairly changeable, but possibly with a dominant trend of bifurcation – there would be one group essentially led by Jake Pearce, and another essentially led by a boy who I haven’t mentioned, Harrison Wearne. Of the two, I would always be in the second.
Harrison Wearne was a subtly ginger-haired, somewhat stocky boy who was highly charismatic and confident, played rugby, had a good sense of humour, had ADD, had extremely indulgent parents (is it telling that the dad was American and the mum was a housewife?), had an addiction to video games, and had an impressive and much-admired older brother. He was also a precociously sexual boy, if only in words (certainly not deeds), a pathology which was probably partly a product of his strong relationship with his older, jockish brother (who was called Cooper, by the way). While I’m on the subject of his lewdness, it behooves me to mention the one memory I have from year 2 that attests to it.
One lunchtime, I was running around in a group essentially led by Harrison. For whatever reason, we stopped running to stand on a footpath in this dark, semi-forested area behind the year 1 classrooms, away from other kids. A conversation began in the shade. One of the things that was brought up (perhaps the first thing that was brought up) was sex – in particular, sexual readiness. To wit, Harrison had asked everyone if they thought they were ready to have sex. What’s funny is that while all his interlocutors expressed a certain tentativeness and equivocality, Mr. Wearne himself was utterly adamant about his maturity. Quoth he, “I would have sex with Elizabeth right now, if I could”. (Elizabeth was, back then, a slim, blonde girl who conformed very well to conventional standards of attractiveness. Incidentally, she was also Christian.)
Naturally, I was sceptical of the truth of Harrison’s words, and for reasons not of psychological doubt but simple biological fact. Harrison showed, at that time, no sign of being particularly mature. He was as much of a boy as any of us, with a high voice, a glabrous body and so on. When I thought of my own penis and how it might interact with an orifice – which I do remember thinking about, as the conversation occurred – I was quite certain that nothing remotely approaching adult “sex” could possibly come of the situation. It would just be a kind of weird, pointless and insensate wiggling. I highly doubted that Harrison had an adult-sized, fully erectable phallus at the age of seven (I think he would have been seven, unless it was after October), so even if he was eager to copulate, I doubt he could physically have done anything about it (certainly not by any orthodox definitions of fornication).     
    So that was the kind of boy Harrison was. Another pertinent datum is that he was allowed to watch South Park and various other licentious programs much earlier than the rest of us, so was peculiarly exposed to fairly mature ideas much earlier than most kids. And when I said his parents were indulgent before, I really did mean it. The basement level of the Wearne’s house was almost entirely taken up by a fully kitted-out rumpus room, with a massive TV, an Xbox and a computer. Harrison would spend most of his time in this recreation area, playing Halo, Age of Empires and whatever other games he had at his disposal. I remember this room very well, because over my years at primary school, I would go to his house many times and always relished the experience (as you might expect). I think I might have first gone to his house when I was in year 2. I’m not sure he’d started doing his famous sleepovers back then (I’ll talk more about them later), but I do have what seems to be a very old memory of visiting Harrison’s house, probably for the first time, and I remember we discussed Age of Empires and cheat codes, and really bonded over some shared history. His house was really a paradise for me. It was truly a child’s dream. His ridiculously permissive mum was a child’s dream mum, too.
All these factors probably explain (in part) why Harrison was always a little fucked up. Notably, his fuckedupness, greater status and masculine confidence didn’t prevent him from actually taking a liking to me in year 2, and despite often being in different classes, we maintained a fairly strong friendship right until the end of year 6. I will talk more about this later, when I discuss year 6.
I have a couple of other memories of Harrison in year 2, which I’ll mention now. The first pertains to a little playground innovation that I thought up, which Harrison immediately endorsed and started executing with me and a couple of other folks. I think it all started with our little troupe being a little bored one lunch-time, and somewhat stumped for ideas. At the time, I remember that one of the few significant objects on Finlay Oval was this brick lying on the sandy ground on its far side, just adjacent to the old metal fence that runs along Finlay Road. Knowing that Harrison and I had a shared history of Age of Empires play, I hit upon a most marvellous notion: we could use the brick as a prop for an imaginative re-enactment of Age of Empires gameplay. Specifically, we could act just like the villagers in the game, hitting the brick with some kind of makeshift hammer and pretending to watch it grow into a fully-sized building. Of course, in hindsight, it seems like the kind of idea a severely brain-damaged amoeba[2] would come up with, but with rich seven-year-old imaginations, it didn’t seem that stupid at the time. In fact, to Harrison, it was a veritable bijou of an idea. He immediately declared his approval, and I immediately swelled with pride and satisfaction. Consequently, with a couple of other followers, we hunkered down and got to work. The game went as follows: we would hit the brick with a stick, pretend that stuff was happening (and that’s about it). I don’t know how long this escapade lasted. It doesn’t seem that sustainable. But I think it lasted longer than you might think. We possibly even returned to this activity on more than one occasion thereafter. Great success!! (as Borat would say).
The other memory was not so rosy. This time, it was also lunch-time, and I was once again running around in a group essentially led by Harrison. I remember we were standing next to the big mound of wood-chips that had been dumped by some kind of delivery truck in preparation for their distribution over one of the garden beds in the school (and then been left there for quite a long time (can’t remember how long)). (Incidentally, on another occasion, I was in this area when someone discovered a tumescent, bulging witchety grub on the mound.) Anyhow, this time something very strange was going on: Harrison was crying. Harrison was the last person in the world I expected to see crying, and yet here he was, for all to see – weeping. The weirdest thing about the whole situation was his face. His face had suddenly become severely contorted, almost as if it was made out of hot candle wax. I remember being disturbed by the scene, and feeling rather shocked that he had succumbed to such a humiliating state. He had lost face (as it were). Most interestingly, I recall not feeling pity but disgust and contempt. He really did look fucking pathetic (and in the contemporary sense of that word). From memory, there wasn’t an obvious catalyst for his breakdown, and I certainly don’t remember what he was decrying once the waterworks began and his visage went all mushy. I do remember that it was a rather momentous occasion, though.
Another important social event to occur to me in year 2 was a moment of ostracism. This was probably the nadir of my year 2 experience. I’m not exactly sure how it happened, but one day the group I was in just disintegrated and I was left to wander the playground alone.[3] It was a very lonely experience, and I didn’t know where to turn. Despite my aimlessness, however, I was aware of the activities of the Independence Class group my old friend Matt Gore was in, whose members were playing handball in the shaded area on the Blytheswood side of the junior campus, very close to the Assembly Hall. At that time, I think this group included Matt, Kimbrian Canavan (one of two bespectacled people in our year), James Vodicka, Josh Clucas and possibly Patrick Sweeney. Somehow, at some point, I worked up the courage to approach this group and ask Matt if I could join in their game. I think I faced some hostility from Kimbrian and I can’t remember if I was allowed to participate this first time. I know that I definitely was later. Indeed, I think I might even have become a semi-permanent fixture of their group. This was better for me, because it was a group composed of people more like me than anyone in 2E, particularly Matt, whose parents were (I think) beginning to form a friendship with mine on account of shared political and cultural interests (particularly in the natural environment) and roughly similar personalities. Recalling this memory of being partly inducted into their group and allowed into their handball game has reminded me of something else: one of the big games that all of the 2E boys participated in was “Wall-ball”. This was basically a variant of handball where everyone was essentially ‘versing’ the wall. The rules are fairly simple, though take a long time to write out if you are aiming for even approximate precision:
·         Like handball, you have to hit the ball forward with your hand, ensuring that it bounces once before connecting with the target (the wall)
·         You are not allowed to hit the ball towards the wall twice in-a-row
·         The ball cannot hit the wall on the full
·         If you hit the ball towards the wall twice in-a-row, that is a foul
·         If you hit the ball onto the wall on the full, that is a foul
·         If you are nearest to the person who just hit the ball towards the wall successfully and the ball is now richoceting back, you are obliged to hit the ball towards the wall yourself
·         If you are this nearest person and you fail to hit the ball that is ricocheting back before it has bounced for a second time, that is a foul
·         All fouls mean immediate banishment to the wall itself
·         If you are banished to the wall itself, you must stand against this wall, facing towards the players who are still in the game
·         If you get hit on any part of your body with the ball while standing on the wall, you are eliminated from the game entirely
·         (On one variant), you are allowed to shuffle sideways to try to dodge the incoming balls, but you cannot twist
·         If you catch a ball while standing on the wall (with your back against the wall), you swap places with the player who hit that ball
·         The game is over when there is one person standing and no-one left on the wall
I remember there was also an informal rule that you couldn’t be too outrageous about your shots, even if they conformed technically to the rules, because that would just ruin the game. For example, if there were only two people left and you did a tiny little mousey shot that just kissed the wall and then started rolling, then that would be regarded as poor sportsmanship. Likewise, if you did a massive, flamboyant “power shot” that ended up landing several metres behind your opponent, you probably wouldn’t get away with that either.
I remember often finding myself acting as some kind of law-enforcer or judge in wall-ball disputes, or a police of cheating. I used to find it extremely frustrating when people flouted the rules. I was one of the few voices of order and reason in a world of anarchy.
I think it was my experience with wallball that meant I wasn’t so bad at handball, and felt confident trying to join the new group. Although I don’t remember spending the rest of my year playing with these kids from the other class, I know that I would have been invited to Matthew Gore’s birthday party, possibly Josh Clucas’ birthday party, and I remember very clearly my special attendance at James Vodicka’s bizarre birthday party.
Now that I’m on the subject of birthday parties, it’s probably a good time to discuss my childhood experiences of anniversarial festivities for the first time. It surprises me that I have hirtherto forgotten the topic. It seems like quite an oversight! The analytical surgery is about to commence. I have donned my latex gloves (with a sterile snap), prepared my instruments (sharpened my scalpels and so on) and thoroughly drugged up my patient. I am just now pulling down the light, the heart monitor’s beeping and I’ve got a demonic rictus engraved into my face as I approach the supple skin of his tumid belly, knife in hand.
I slip and I slash open the stomach and yellowy-red globs of fat spill out, in much the same way as the innards in a gutted fish. I lick my lips. The massacre commences.
That is a totally inapposite metaphor and I do not understand why I used it, except perhaps the influence of the violent video game I have been playing recently, Fallout 4. It was a totally asinine move.
To return to what I was saying, what makes the oversight more curious is that birthday parties are really central to the childhood experience – the infant condition (at least in the first-world). Of course, I haven’t completely omitted the subject, because I did earlier mention the first birthday party I remember, that of the Asian boy I called Daniel (I don’t think that was his name). But I certainly have omitted the few memories I have of my 5th and 6th birthday parties!
In truth, I think it’s pointless to dwell too long on birthday parties. Everyone understands them. In any case, I don’t actually remember that many in much detail, so I couldn’t dwell too long on birthday parties even if I wanted to. I think childhood birthday parties were also sufficiently similar in outline to be summed up without much effort. The primary features of all the celebrations I remember were “passing the parcel”, “musical chairs”, “apple bobbing” (slightly rare), popping balloons, playing tip, gorging on delicious food (including the ceremony of the birthday cake), sitting down for a present session where the birthday boy was meant to practise the adult skill of showing disingenuous gratitude, and (finally) collecting party bags at the end, which were filled with so many sugary goodies you would get diabetes if you tried to eat them in one go.
Of course, when I say “primary features”, I certainly don’t mean invariant features. There were, after all, some more novel parties, and many parties that just didn’t take place at the home. One popular party destination when I was a young lad was this jungle gym that used to be in Westfield Hornsby. I can’t remember what it was called, but I know it was a franchise of some kind, and that they specialised in birthday parties. The word “Club” is coming to me; maybe it was called “Kids Club” or something. I should say that one still did have delicious food and the birthday cake ceremony in these parties, just none of the other “primary features”. Another popular destination (but perhaps mainly in later years) was ten-pin bowling. Again, the closest bowling alley to most of us was in Hornsby, an AMF place which had all the standard attributes of such places, including the foul hot dogs and the strange custom of showing video clips on the plasma screens hanging down from the roof. Incidentally, one of the earliest ten-pin bowling birthday parties I attended was that of my cousin Angus (maternal side) in Newcastle, when he was turning maybe 10 or 11 (not sure which). I remember that I was a bit nervous to meet all his older friends (on account of my shyness), but that I ended up enjoying it quite a lot, and got on really well with at least a few of them. In particular, I remember feeling that my sense of humour resonated very well with theirs. I even remember one joke that greatly amused me at the time. The way it happened was this: one of the boys from Angus’ friend group said something like “Don’t you reckon the Wiggles’ dance moves look like someone shooting at people?” and then proceeded to mime the index-finger-outstretched-thumb-up Wiggles gestures. I then giggled uncontrollably (it really did look like someone carrying out a massacre). Now, before you begin to worry that I was a psychopathic demon child, I should make clear that my laugh was not a direct response to the diabolical image of a rampaging lunatic; instead, it was a response to the more sophisticated and abstract idea of a totally sunny, inoffensive and manifestly benign kid’s presenter unknowingly imitating a rampaging lunatic. You see, I wasn’t psychopathic, but urbane!
While I’m on the subject of the Wiggles, it’s also important to mention the Wiggles concert I went to around the age of four or five,[4] which I think might also have been in Newcastle. I believe I was there with my other maternal cousin Charlotte. It was not a happy experience. Showing the early manifestations of my innate anhedonism and overanalysis of revelry, I utterly loathed this concert, and felt absolutely zero inclination to dance or scream, despite the frenetic arm-flailing of those around me and their deafening howls. I just couldn’t understand what was so exciting about looking down at some people I didn’t particularly like from fifty metres up. It was so dull. They weren’t funny at all, their songs weren’t interesting, and I certainly didn’t feel as if I was in the presence of some superior beings, as the minions around me clearly did. Even if I had worshipped the Wiggles, the proximity still wouldn’t have provoked a frenzy in me, because I realised I wasn’t really in their presence. The spectacle was utterly unreal, and there was clearly a decisive separation between us kids and the Wiggles, both physically and attitudinally (I knew they didn’t really care about kids). I also felt no obligation to obey their demands to “Raise my arms”, “Dance around” and “Tell Jeff to wake up”. It seemed utterly absurd. Why should I obey them? What reason do I have? What is the point? Most curiously: why on earth are all these hideous children around me so servile? Why do they enjoy dancing so much? An awful experience, I must say.
From year 3 or 4 on, the most popular destination for birthday parties was probably laser tag. You can understand why.
I remember more of my own birthday parties from the ages of 5-7 than I do of anyone else’s, perhaps in part because of the photos we have. In accordance with this weak photo hypothesis, I do have strongest recall of sitting around the wooden table on the verandah (which was our designated birthday table), and almost no memory of doing any birthday activities inside. I think the other reason for my strong recollection of sitting around the table was this recurring cakey misfortune[5] that befell me every year until my seventh birthday.
The bakery we always frequent to get crusty bread and various other things is called Pierre’s Patisserie and is located in Turramurra. When I was a young child, this was always where my mum used to buy birthday cakes for me. Unfortunately, there wasn’t always a very large range (apart from fruity cakes (eg lemon slice, apple tarte tatin and cherry clafoutis)), and my mum thus always decided to get their chocolatey cake. Though it ostensibly contained no alcohol, I always remember this cake having a highly unpleasant, alcoholic aftertaste, which always ruined my birthday. I think it was on my sixth birthday that this tragic trend reached its apogee. Before my mum went off to buy me my cake, I had entreated her to avoid buying the alcoholic cake at all costs. I could no longer bear the horror, and I expected my mum would realise this and follow my request. But she did not. She did ask the woman at the counter if the only chocolatey cake on display was alcoholic and got a “No” reply, however this was inadequate verification of the taste of the cake. When my mum brought it home, I knew immediately that it was the same cake as I had had last year, and I immediately began to fear that it would have the same taste. I asked my mum why she hadn’t just opted for a different gatĂŞau, and she replied that she didn’t want to get me a fruity cake. I was perplexed by this, as I had given her no indication of any distaste for fruity cakes. I did hold out hope that they might have changed the formula or that my tastebuds might have changed, but alas, it was not so.
After blowing out the candles and listening to everyone belting out a stirring rendition of Happy Birthday, I took the first slice of cake and put it in my mouth. Within a couple of chews, the verdict was clear: I was eating the same sullied cake as last year. It was revolting, and I revolted. “Mum, why did you buy it again? I told you not to. It tastes like alcohol.” I soon tried to curry favour with my friends, particularly those next to me. “Don’t you reckon it tastes funny? Like alcohol? I can’t eat it; it’s too disgusting.” Though some were eating it happily, others recognised the rancidity and joined my cause. The power I felt almost made up for the vomitousness of the cake.
But I don’t think anything really happened after that, except perhaps a reprimand administered to me by my aunt Meg, who was living with us at that time. Incidentally, Meg lived with us for many years and it’s strange I haven’t mentioned her, because she was a fairly important part of our lives. Not an entirely good one, though, apart from her role in introducing me to Age of Empires. To be precise, I remember being a little irritated by her quite often – for example, concerning her habit of replying to the question “What’s for dinner?” (always posed to my parents) with the extremely witty, almost Wildean interjection, “Food”. (I know it’s food, but I want to know what food dammit!) I suppose she thought she was doing my parents a favour by obviating the question, but I doubt they appreciated her subjecting their progeny to such discourtesy.
I remember getting very excited about creating party bags on one of my birthdays, as I also did with balloons (although I remember I only learnt to tie them very late on). I recall that including Wizz-Fizzes in my party bags was a unique element, and one that I thought everyone would enjoy. At all my birthday parties, I think I also would have prescribed a high ratio of sour sweets (like sour snakes) and coke bottles to more bland and saccharine ones (like Allen’s “Strawberries and cream” lollies, or green or red frogs). Unlike some people, I did appreciate a good lolly banana, though. Unlike some people, though, I despised all licorice-based sweets, including licorice “All-sorts”. I still don’t appreciate licorice. It’s not really a lolly, in my opinion. It just tastes gross, like eating unusually soft leather covered in a noxious, highly musky polish or resin. It’s wrong.
I also have one memory of playing pass-the-parcel. It was ok. A pretty stupid game, however, because the rewards are always terrible, and the process is not at all exciting.
To return to year 2, I will now discuss the childhood birthday that I remember best, that of my seventh birthday, which would have occurred right after the start of year 2. I was extremely excited about my seventh birthday. This was chiefly for the reason that it was going to be a grander and more magnificent party than I’d ever tried to orchestrate before (and certainly since). The theme, I had decided, was to be “pirates” (or piracy), and everyone was to wear a costume. As the big day approached, preparations really ramped up. I think my dad made a big flag with the classic pirate logo emblazoned on it; certain piratical decorations were hoisted in various places, particularly around the centrepiece of the party, the verandah (which you could perhaps imagine as the deck of a ship); a walkable plank was installed just behind the back of the verandah, at the south-eastern corner; a big crucifix was erected outside the cubby house[6] with the words “Beware of Pirates” inscribed in white paint on the crossbar; a treasure hunt was set up in the lantana-infested, turpentine, rainforest-like bushland behind our house; and most importantly, my mum finally decided (on persuasion) to make use of this special book of craft cakes influenced by cartoons and pop culture, and began to craft a cake in the shape of a big treasure chest. To my disappointment, my mum did skimp a bit on the extremely finicky and involved procedures required for this recipe, and I suspect she didn’t procure all the rather niche and fancy ingredients necessary to make the cake perfectly (eg “sugar glue”, used extensively in all the recipes in this mesmeric book). As a result, the cake didn’t look much like the picture, and it was also pink, which was totally at odds with the image I had in my head. Nevertheless, it was still a laudable achievement.
In the end, the party itself was a roaring success. That said, I think other kids kind of overshadowed me in certain respects, and I didn’t really like that. I think this is liable to happen at parties with overly structured activities. The other kids get really into the task at hand and then beat you at it, and that makes you feel decidedly unspecial. Of course, none of this is to take away from the party. I do recall enjoying it quite a lot overall, especially all the swordfights.
I will now discuss the other memories I have from year 2 that pertain in some way to birthday parties. One memory that I find quite amusing (in hindsight) took place in a car during the birthday party of someone who was in the car (perhaps Josh Clucas). I think we might have been on our way to the Indoor Action Sports Centre at Thornleigh, which was a popular site for birthday parties that I haven’t yet mentioned. This particular party no doubt took place after my decision to start hanging out a bit more with some of the kids from the Independent Class. I know this because the party was essentially an Independent Class party. Anyway, the memory is simple: Kimbrian (I think it was Kimbrian – either him or Matt) started talking about “square roots” (in typical nerdy fashion) and boasting about how they learnt this mathematical procedure in class ahead of the curriculum, (possibly) because Grant Kynaston had already learnt them and was gloating about this. (Grant Kynaston being the bespectacled, ginger-haired super nerd of Warrawee who would leave for Knox the next year, then get a scholarship to Sydney Grammar for high school and eventually top four subjects in the HSC, get a perfect ATAR and appear on the front cover of the Sydney Morning Herald (and become a friend of mine, sort of).) Kimbrian and Matt then pronounced that square roots were easier than you might think, and gave me a few examples. I can’t remember if they did a good job of explaining it (they probably didn’t) or if I fully grasped the idea that the square root of n is just the number that you square to get n. But I might have. Anyhow, it is funny regardless.
Previously, I mentioned my attendance at James Vodicka’s party, and described it as being somewhat strange. I’ll explain this now. For some unfathomable reason, I was the only person invited to the birthday party of one of the most popular kids in the year, and I wasn’t even that good friends with him. I don’t understand how it happened at all. I remember we went to some concert, and that was the reason why he was only able to invite one person. Since I was the only one attending, my parents agreed that I should get an elaborate present, and we ended up purchasing this big foam-rocket blaster from the National Geographic shop in Hornsby Westfield. I then arrived at his house, was thanked by his mother for getting him “two presents” (one of the rockets was wrapped separately from the rocket blaster), and after firing his present a few times – resulting in losing one of our rockets on the roof – we left for the concert. I have no memory of what we saw.
The last birthday-related memory from year 2 I shall discuss was not one I participated in, but observed from afar. As I was not very cool and had no aspirations to be cool in the standard manner of the supposed “cool people” of 2E[7], I was largely excluded from the 2E social life of all those who self-identified as “cool” or were desperate to be. One of these vapid and contemptible human beings who self-identified as cool was a boy with a French dad and curly golden-brown hair called Daniel Cascales. Daniel rode around on a skateboard, was never serious about anything, was totally unemotional (I remember him often laughing at others’ misfortune) and utterly narcissistic. He was no worse than anyone else, though. Anyhow, he had his birthday party at some point during the year, and I know that he took all the attendees to Luna Park. Presumably, they had some fun being delinquents at Luna Park and believing themselves great rebels against society (despite the truth being, as I wrote in the footnote, that they were quite the opposite), but I know it wasn’t all fun and games, because the Monday after the party (I assume it was Monday), I remember Daniel Cascales being mocked for his reluctance to go on the “Wild Mouse”. The Wild Mouse was the only big and scary rollercoaster at Luna Park, and the real centrepiece of the Luna Park experience. I thought this attitude towards Daniel was so cruel and ruthless, and betrayed the deep callousness of so many of my male classmates (q.v. my brief comments earlier about evolutionary psychology, as well as my footnote about what these boys thought was “cool”). I think I felt glad that I hadn’t been at the Luna Park party after seeing the attendees’ treatment of a birthday boy who simply feared being sent 50 metres into the air on a little carriage rattling along a narrow, railless, sharply twisting track, and then being thrown down absurdly steep descents so fast a reasonable man could be forgiven for thinking his face was going to come loose from his skull. I suspected I also might have chickened out, despite my bravery on “Thunder Mountain” at Disneyland the year before, and thus very much empathised.
I should note at this point that, though I definitely disdained the cultural preferences and comportment of the aspirant “cool” boys in 2E, it was not exactly for the high-minded, somewhat intellectual and philosophic notions I have been invoking in my retrospective analysis. I did, of course, only have a vague and very untutored notion of evolutionary psychology (I wouldn’t have even known the phrase), and when it came to the Americanised and corporatised popular culture fixations of the boys around me, I mainly felt a curmudgeonly contempt inherited from my dad, rather than any reflective distaste. The latter fact can be illustrated by my beliefs about music at the time. While all the kids around me were listening to So Fresh 2004 and all the boys enjoyed shouting the Outkast song with the line “Roses really smell like poo poo poo” as an affirmation of their gender, my favourite band was – wait for it – XTC. Yes, my favourite band was the somewhat indie, somewhat experimental, lyrically-interesting eighties pop-rock band known as XTC. My dad had their greatest hits album, which had a little lamb on the cover flying over a bucolic landscape and featured such tracks as “Life Begins at the Hop”, “Generals and Majors”, “Making Plans for Nigel”, “Senses Working Overtime”, “Love on a Farmboy’s Wages”, “Dear God” (which I found really thought-provoking at the time), “Mayor of Simpleton” and my all-time favourite, “Peter Pumpkinhead”. I always made mondegreens of XTC’s lyrics, much to my dad’s amusement. I think I was probably also starting to get into Led Zeppelin, enjoyed Muse songs, very much enjoyed the Queen Greatest Hits album we had, enjoyed many of the contemporary indie artists that my dad played (the album Suburban Songbook by Bob Evans (real name Kevin Mitchell) was played routinely on roadtrips and became a favourite, as did the albums of that excellent band The Shins), and also was learning to love many of my dad’s favourite classical pieces through exposure on those rare occasions (usually on weekends) when he decided to blast Bach, Beethoven, Verdi, Ravel (or whoever) through the house. I had an extremely diverse music education, which I’ll expand on a bit more when I discuss my saxophone playing. Anyway, the important point is that I was massively influenced by my dad, and my dad was a curmudgeon who had very strong opinions on culture, and I basically absorbed these uncritically. One time, I remember Lucy Lancaster bringing in music for some reason (perhaps some kind of presentation) and choosing that extremely catchy song “Play that Funky Music”. Not only did I mishear the lyrics as “Play that Funky Music Whiteboard” (and therefore never understand the meaning), but I also didn’t really like the song, primarily (I think) just because I was suspicious of things other people liked. On another occasion, the dunce Josh Warren voiced his appreciation of The Red Hot Chili Peppers. This time, I think I was more open to the sensibilities of the common man, but when I came home and asked my dad of his opinion of that band, he was totally contemptuous. My views ossified in an instant.
I think there must have been some routine in 2E of allowing people to bring in music they liked, because I remember I myself brought in a CD to play to the class towards the end of the year. And the album I took was… The Greatest Hits of XTC. It never got played, for some reason. Mrs Evans didn’t know what it was, and therefore couldn’t approve it or something.
Speaking of XTC, just about the only time Oscar Mckay actually came to my house, I forced him to listen to the hilarious song Peter Pumpkinhead, which I had mentioned to him a few times on account of how funny the lyrics were. This didn’t go that well, because it’s a long song and not that funny. I guess I hoped he’d immediately start liking XTC, as I did. It was not to be.  
The first song I ever liked totally independent of my dad was the 2004 classic “Take me Out” by that shitty Scottish band, Franz Ferdinand. I heard this for the first time (at least I think it was the first time) at an AFL game, which I had been taken to by Daniel van den Bovenkamp and his dad. Incidentally, I can’t really remember when I started going to Daniel van den Bovenkamp’s house a lot, but I guess it might have been 2004. His sister Amelia was in Miranda’s year and had been her friend for a while (though she was quite prickly, apparently). In retrospect, this first exposure to “Take me Out” was significant in a lot of respects. It was my first AFL game, probably the first sporting match I hadn’t attended with my dad, and the first time I had ever listened to a song and straight away decided I liked it. The video clip had the band members playing their instruments in a kind of x-ray vision, revealing their cybord bodies. Along with the music, it was highly compelling. The match I don’t remember so well. Possibly Barry Hall kicked a penalty, and lots of booing went on, including from Daniel van den Bovenkamp’s dad.
Later, I would hear the song again when Miranda bought the So Fresh 2004 CD. This time, it really caught my attention, and even led to me professing my fondness for the song to my family. The cycle was complete when I asked for the album as a birthday present for my 8th birthday. In the end, I received this along with my own personal CD player, which was a little spheroid thing with the CD turn-table placed at the top. This player would get a lot of use over the next two or three years. The album itself probably got played two hundred times inside this player, despite the fact that it was (looking back) a pretty terrible album. Even at the time, I only really liked two or three songs. I also remember I had a pretty long phase where every afternoon when I came home, I would put the Franz Ferdinand album into the big audio system downstairs, skip to track three, and have a good, hard listen to “Take me Out”. Boy was I obsessed. I was disappointed to learn that the lyrics were almost certainly about dating, however. I was also a little bit crestfallen when I made my dad listen to the song attentively and he wasn’t that enthused.
   A hell of a lot happened when I was in year 2, and it’s really taking a long time to get through it all. One of the most significant things to occur was that I started playing the saxophone.
Need I say more? Yes, I suppose so.
My dad had somehow managed to foster in me a love for the saxophone as a child. His extensive record collection (including actual records and a vinyl player, which we have since consigned to the garage) incorporated music from the Middle Ages to 21st Century indie pop, and naturally various saxophone pieces abounded. Ironically, my dad wasn’t a huge fan of jazz, although he did like certain jazz styles and I know I was exposed to a fair amount of jazz saxophone as a child. He also really liked Maurice Ravel, who used the saxophone quite a lot. All the types of saxophone are, of course, immensely expressive instruments, capable of very different tones and timbres, from delicate, vibrato chortling to reedy, guttural barking. I didn’t really know which one I liked best as a young child (I probably couldn’t rattle off the four main types, Baritone, Tenor, Alto, Soprano), but I did know that I really wanted to play the saxophone.
I remember my parents (maybe my mum in particular) were keen on getting me to play the euphonium (and later graduate to the tuba), and adduced my much older cousin Alex’s playing of the tuba as a reason for me to play it. I never really understood this, and thus never seriously considered the possibility of opting for the manifestly unsexy, cetacean tuba in place of the radiantly sexy and rather magisterial saxophone.  
When the day finally arrived for the Warrawee musical neophytes to try out their shortlisted instruments for the first time, I knew that I was going to have to try the euphonium out (to placate my parents) but that I was almost certainly going to pick the saxophone, if I had anything to say about it. From memory, when I got into the inauguration room, full of musical instruments and their senior players, I went to the tuba first (on the sufferance of my parents) and successfully made a noise on my second attempt (I think). After that, however, I went straight to the saxophone in the room – an alto – which was being supervised by a girl. This was easy to play on first go, and, for me, that was enough to seal the deal. Sign the papers, mumma, I commanded, and I walked into the moonlight with an ugly brown saxophone case, beaming as I strolled away into the darkness of the night just as the moon beams through the cosmic tenebrosity, conducting the tides of time and fate and cosmic mystery like the moon conducts the tides every day, in and out, in and out, an endless rhythm, forever coming, forever going, the ebb and flow of life, ying and yang, the duality of everything, etc.
I am a stellar (or should I say lunar) humourist, am I not?
It was probably on this same night that my parents were given the contact details of some possible teachers. Ultimately, my saxophone teacher ended up being a relatively young woman who also conducted the Stage Band at Warrawee (kind of like the school “big band”) and lived with her parents in Hornsby Heights. Let’s say she was called Annabelle. I think she was a very intelligent person who’d been raised in a working-class family and gone to a non-selective school. Her mother was some kind of domestically based beautician, I think, and her father maybe a former labourer who drove some bus occasionally (possibly for disabled kids), and so she was in a rather strange situation with her multiple musical diplomas (she was a skilled pianist as well as a saxophonist and clarinettist), taste for fine culture and composing ability (I remember seeing a framed certificate in the music room of her house declaring her success in a music composition competition sponsored by Mcdonalds). I didn’t really think about any of this at the time, though. In fact, I never saw her house until maybe my second year of tutelage, because I was initially taught at school, during the afternoons (can’t remember which day now – possibly Wednesday). In particular, I was taught in the room next to the Independent Class classroom along with Ryan Jones, the aforementioned, NPD-afflicted boy I also played cricket with.
We always had a routine with these lessons. First Ryan would play for half an hour, as I sat around waiting, then I would play for half an hour. The book both of us used was Off to a Great Start Book 1 by Mark Walton, which progressed from ‘songs’ where you just played the note B lots of times (the one in the middle of the treble clef), in order to learn how to interpret time signatures, then progressed to basic melodies like “Mary had a Little Lamb” and “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star”, then to slightly more complex melodies, and finally to songs like “English Country Garden”, which included quavers and quite an extensive range of notes. I remember there was also a new note introduced on every page (or close to it), accompanied by a little fingering chart. This new note then became part of whatever song or songs were on that same page. The book was a very good pedagogical tool and I think I advanced rapidly. Admittedly, the saxophone is the easiest instrument to learn in the entire orchestra (but not easy to become excellent at).
I can’t remember now if I did the First Grade saxophone exam late in year 2 or early in year 3, but whatever the case, I must have started preparations for it in my first year. This would have involved buying a few more books, learning scales for the first time and taking up some kind of practice regimen. I have always been above average in laziness, and I think I never ever got above three practice sessions a week for the saxophone. Nevertheless, I know I learnt the songs I had to play pretty well. That said, I do remember that I was a little shocked to discover only two or three weeks before my First Grade exam was scheduled that Annabelle usually expected her First Grade students to memorise their pieces. I hadn’t memorised them at that point, and briefly worried that I would be unable to. However, upon putting some effort into it, I easily committed them to memory.
Before my exam, I didn’t really know what grade I would get. I even had some visions of total failure, partly inspired by the account my mum had told me of one scholarly Warrawee student in my sister’s year who had mentally disintegrated during her First Grade exam and ended up only just scraping a pass, with the grade C-minus. In my case, though, the examiner turned out to have far lower standards than I expected. Notwithstanding this fact, you may be leery of predicting my success in this matter, cognisant that the only theme of this book is that the cruel mistress of fate seems to have a particular enmity towards me (perhaps I was a philanderer and cheated on her in a past life). The consequence this had for our present concern, my First Grade saxophone exam, is that my First Grade saxophone exam did not go to plan in one major respect. While I had memorised my pieces, as I said, I had still brought the three books in which they were printed along into the exam room (which I possibly did for administrative purposes as well as to give the piano part to Annabelle, who was my accompanist). Indeed, all of the books were sitting on my stand as I played. The problem was that the examiner didn’t seem to notice that I wasn’t reading them as I played. Naturally, this was almost entirely my fault, because I could have put the stand to one side to very clearly signify my freedom from direct external input, and I didn’t. I guess I just assumed the examiner would realise the books were closed on my stand. Anyway, I’m still not even sure if he did or didn’t notice, but what happened towards the end of the exam suggests that the latter is far more likely. After noticing that I was giving the impression of reliance on manuscript despite not reading any sheet music, Annabelle decided to take matters into her own hands. She got up from her seat by the piano in the interval between my second and third songs and moved my stand several metres away from me. I then played the last song as I had the other two, complete with not only correct notes but also all the subtle intonation and volume-changes I had learnt. When I did finish this final piece, the examiner suddenly seemed really impressed and came up to me expressing joyful surprise, “Did you really perform that from memory, with all those crescendos and diminuendos? Wow, well done!” I was taken aback by this sudden effusive praise, and wondered what the heck was so special about that last piece (unless he hadn’t realised I had memorised the others, too!). But all I actually did was nod politely. My shyness prevented me from making clear to him that I had memorised all the pieces, and that there was relly nothing special about that one. A shame. I got an A, but I reckon I could have gotten an A+ if he knew that my entire performance was memorised. 
I think I also joined the Warrawee Junior Band in year 2. It seems unlikely that they would have let year 2s join the band at the very start of the year, but maybe a little later it was allowed. One of the pieces we played was a Queen medley, and we probably also played a couple of simplistic arrangements of movie scores. I have almost no memories of this first year of band. I do know that it would have culminated in the band camp, which was always held at Baden Powell Scout Centre in Thornleigh, a place where we always had a lot of fun playing ball games and the food was delicious (there was this rumour running around the place that the chefs once cooked for the Queen or something). Band camp also involved a lot of work, and ever wind or brass player always ended up with very sore ‘chops’. This was the main downside, along with homesickness, but it was always a good experience overall.
One of the last things that happened in year 2 with “International Day”, for which our class was nominated France. This meant we would have to learn lots about France, decorate our country in Gallic paraphernalia, and bring in French food and music for the big day.  There obviously would have been International Days when I was in year 1 and kindergarten but I don’t really remember them (hence why I haven’t mentioned them). I think I probably remember this one best because I was a substantial contributor to the festivities, perhaps the biggest in the class. I had this rĂ´le, of course, because I had been to France the year before and my dad had brought back French CDs that I could play, as well as given me knowledge that I wanted to apply. I’m not sure if I ended up bringing food (though I think I wanted to, because curmudgeonly me suspected (correctly) that the people assigned would end up bringing in bastardised versions of French food products, whereas I would be able to get the most authentic possible). In any case, I know I did bring the CDs, which featured a lot of piano accordion and were probably quite boring for children. As usual, I didn’t really count myself among the unwashed masses. I was like a missionary, an emissary of light bringing culture to the barbarians.

To change the subject completely, I’d now like to give a brief account of the place of religion in my life around 2004.
I think I was never really a believer. Since my parents were not religious (though my mum has slight leanings, perhaps), I didn’t get baptised, and I was never indoctrinated in any other way while I was an infant. At school, however, my parents chose for me to be in the Scripture classes, rather than just playing with toys in the computer lab or whatever, as the non-Christian children did. Scripture classes were actually extremely odd, in hindsight. We got given these strange exercise books, filled with cartoon pictures of scenes that allegedly took place thousands of years ago in the Middle East, and were taught various Biblical “facts” that we had to use to answer questions. An apocryphal miracle here and there, and so many fucking quaint names of Kings, prophets, places, peoples and wars. All of it totally irrelevant and pointless. I remember almost none of it. Also, at the back, there were lyrics to a set of utterly ridiculous, maudlin and embarrassing songs. One of these probably got played every lesson, to no-one’s excitement.
One of the few tales that did inspire me, though, was the tale of David and Goliath. When I say “I was never really a believer”, I’m not entirely sure that that’s the truth. I think I did kind of accept at face value a lot of the things the Scripture teachers told us (that’s what’s scary about the church proselytising to children who don’t know how to think yet) and I think I did occasionally believe in God. I certainly prayed to Him on occasion, when things weren’t going too well, although I really wasn’t sure if He was there, or if He was listening. The important fact is that I definitely believed in the tale of David and Goliath, and I know this because of a comment I remember making to my mum. This story is a slightly odd one. Basically, my favourite bananas back in year 2 were “Lady finger” bananas. Lady finger bananas were this short and squat variety that tasted kind of unripe and very, very sweet. I never liked bananas that were even a tiny bit overripe, so this was the natural choice for me. One day, I think I decided to take two Lady finger bananas for my lunch. When break-time came, I remember munching away on these bananas in the corner of the playground, near the Finlay toilets, and thinking about the parable of David and Goliath. Feeling very manly about eating two big, fat bananas, I suddenly had this great associative epiphany: eating lots of Lady finger bananas is exactly the sort of thing Goliath would do. That afternoon, when mum asked about my day, I told her about this thought. She smiled. That is it.
I have a fair few year 2 memories of arriving early in the playground. I remember cold mornings where I would walk into the grey playground wearing only shorts and a thin jumper and sit down on a bench feeling very chilly. I remember getting in Meg’s car one morning and being asked incredulously if I was really only going to wear shorts, and replying that my legs didn’t get cold (it’s still true, my legs don’t get cold – I just need socks). I also remember one very warm morning either at the beginning or the end of the year where rumours were circulating that school might even be cancelled due to the extreme heat. I recall that I was very excited about this possibility and had my fingers crossed the whole time. Nothing came of it – except a lot of sweat on the schoolbus-ride home. Incidentally, now that I’ve mentioned school buses, I’d like to mention that there was this one bus driver (everybody’s favourite) who used to say “I taught I saw a Puddy Tat” all the time. He was an odd fellow (seemingly not a pedo, though!). What’s even odder is that I remember one time when I was in year 4 or 5, he was engaged in a music-related conversation with Daniel Baber, a younger boy who lived in my street, and told Baber that his favourite artists were “Mozart and Beethoven”. He asked Daniel if he knew who they were, and Daniel said “No”. I was so appalled at his ignorance that I felt like blowing up the bus there and then. 
 I will finish this main body of year 2 anecdotes by relating one of the most embarrassing (and yet lucky) moments of my life. It took place at lunchtime, though it had its origin in the preceding hour. As soon as I say the following sentence, you will be able to guess the nature of the event. On some 2004 day around noon, I was busting in class. I either didn’t ask to go to the bathroom during class, or my request was rejected (perhaps because it was close to lunch). Regardless of the prelude to this tragic event, I know that I found myself bolting out of the classroom as soon as the bell sounded, and made a beeline straight for the toilets. As far as the bustingness goes, I remember that I was right on the point of no return. Tragically, I then discovered that the toilets were barred shut. I mean, I think I might have feared this as I approached (it was possibly some kind of early lunchtime routine). I recall an awareness that they would be opened within fifteen minutes or so, but I recognised that waiting would be almost impossible.
The crux is that there was nothing I could do, unless I was going to be really bold and brave and ask a teacher for help. I was not that bold and brave. Instead, I waddled anxiously back towards the eating area on the other side of the playground, praying that I could hold the pee in. When I got back to the benches, I think everyone had started eating. And so I did too. I sat down with some other kids in my class, zipped open my school bag and cracked upon my lunch box. One of the items my mum had included that day was a small, white Tupperware container of very juicy pineapple chunks. This was to be significant. I don’t know if the pineapple chunks were the first thing I started eating, but I do recall they ended up being a minor topic of conversation when I did start eating them. Perhaps some boy thought it was weird that I was eating pieces of pineapple for lunch or something. I do know that I was dribbling a bit of juice as I chewed them; I think that might have been commented on by someone also.
Notably, I recall that there was a layer of yellow liquid inside the container.
As I was eating these chunks of pineapple, the urge to pee grew inexorably stronger. The struggle to maintain a normal expression was immense. It really was so painful to hold the liquid at bay, and I was terrified that the damn would burst and that megatonnes would flow out, devastating the landscape, flattening trees, contaminating pristine waterways, killing countless endeagered animals (humour comes from absurd extension of a metaphor!). No really, it was fucking terrifying. I’m not sure I can describe it to you. Perhaps it is best compared to that famous scene in The Shining. I’m the woman; her expression when Johnny’s splintering the door with his axe was my expression as I sat on the bench – it was just hidden beneath my mask of equanimity. An equally apposite analogue is the figure in that famous 1893 Edward Munch painting “The Scream”.
The fact is that I was right to be terrified, because near the end of my pineapple munching, the Thing actually happened. I froze. I was in shock. Mortified, petrified, fossilised. What should I do? A warm stream was emerging from my groin, seeping through my underpants, rapidly darkening the crotch on my grey pants, and beginning even to leak out onto the ground. Oh shit. And then one of them noticed. The first words this noticer said were,
“Your pineapple container is leaking.”
For a second, I wasn’t sure if he was sincere or serious, but my adrenaline-flooded brain quickly computed that he was (the reason I’m just using the pronoun is that I can’t remember who it was). Though unbelievably optimific in the situation, this reaction was quite baffling to me: this person genuinely thought it was pineapple juice that explained the darkening of my crotch and the gradually increasing puddle on the concrete below us. How could he think that? Later, I would see that his reaction did make some sense. The idea of a seven year old randomly, with no precedent, pissing his pants would have been quite far from his thoughts, so pineapple-juice-leakage (or spillage) had to be it. And, miraculously, I was still holding a pineapple juice container in my hand at that point (albeit one whose juice level hadn’t gone down). It is for this reason that the others seemed to come to the same conclusion about the source of the leaking liquid. I was still mortified after this development, but the relief was immense. Fucking hell.
I still knew I had to get out of there, though. I recognised that they could easily find out the truth, either from the ammonic reek of my pants or various other clues present at the scene. I did realise that there might still be clues even if I left, but leaving was my best chance of avoiding humiliation. I told them I had to get myself cleaned up and immediately headed for the nurse’s office. Even after I’d escaped, it was still horrifying to have to reveal to the nurse that I’d pissed myself and that I needed spare pants, and I’m not sure my heart-rate went down as I neared her office. But when I had donned a pair of spare pants, I’m sure it went down a little. An extremely lucky break. As far as I know, no-one ever found out the truth. And hopefully they won’t, because it is not improbable that none of those present will ever read this.   
 Although it didn’t feel like it at the time, the fact that I just happened to have pineapple chunks for lunch on the day that I would piss my pants suggests that God was partly on my side, kind of half-smiling at me (while the other half of him jerked himself off at the distress and misery he had caused).



[1] Incidentally, my mum was never involved in this kind of thing, being too busy at work.
[2] Yes I know amoebas don’t have brains.
[3] So maybe it wasn’t so much ostracism as community-implosion.
[4] Yes, we are going back in time again.
[5] Can’t find any Latinate that means “pertaining to cake”. Too poltroon to coin my own.
[6] Which sits on the western, bamboo side of our house, near the back (and it’s technically not in our property, though the house that ‘owns’ it is probably not aware of it).
[7] Which actually meant being dupes to corporatised “rebellion”, wearing American shoes, liking American music (particularly violent, angry, infantile and sexist rap), riding skateboards, enjoying the most egregiously stupid and generally offensive show known as Jackass, and constantly adopting a masculine bravado for no reason.  

Friday, 23 October 2015

Extract 7

Junior Sport: Musings on Propriety and Relative Efficacy in Language and Batting Technique, Ample Alliteration in Onomastic Descriptions of Notable Cricket Players, and a Pointless Graph:

I think it was probably towards the end of year 1 that I started playing “Kanga” cricket. My dad had signed me up for the programme at the same club I played soccer at, Kissing Point. I remember Kanga cricket was a highly informal thing. We would all go to this field called the Glade in Wahroonga, not too far away from our house, and then for two hours do a whole series of drills and exercises, culminating in a game of “Diamond cricket”. Richard Jones was the coach, the father of a boy from Warrawee with (undiagnosed) narcissistic personality disorder named Ryan. I remember Richard taught us to bowl by analogising the motion of the arms to the action of a windmill, and the rapid drop of the left arm as the right arm came over (or vice versa in devil spawn) to the image of “yanking a chain”. This was a pretty handy pair of metaphors, and most people picked the basic skill up relatively easily, I think (though variation in skill emerged quickly, as it always does with sport). I can’t remember who was the best bowler now, although I think I wasn’t too bad.
Learning to bat with “proper technique” was possibly even harder than learning to bowl, despite one’s intuitive sense that whacking a ball must be a more natural skill than learning to throw in a very peculiar way without bending your arm. It is, of course, true that whacking a ball is a more natural skill than learning to bowl, but one of the many strange things about cricket is that batting with “proper technique” is not even remotely close to whacking a ball, and doesn’t in the least resemble the style of batting common in baseball. Instead, “proper technique” in batting is a bit like “Received Pronunciation” in English locution. Both of them are the traditional, aristocratic, Etonian, Oxbridgian way of doing things; they both seem more proper and decorous than other styles; they’re both very hard to learn without training; and they both generally work, though there’s scant evidence that they’re more efficient ways of doing things than any others. Just as Cambridge English involves a speech impediment on Rs so that you’re differentiated from the common folk, proper batting technique requires you to hold your elbow up in a very uncomfortable and mechanically inefficient pose so that your default shots are always “straight”. Just as Received Pronunciation makes you sound very starchy and priggish, proper batting technique requires that you stand perfectly perpendicular to the bowler and keep absolutely still – a very poncy pose. And just as the Oxbridge culture makes allowances for outbursts of ribaldry and vulgarity on specific festive occasions, proper technique permits you to play more base and loose shots like “cuts”, “pulls”, “hooks” and “hoiks”, but only in certain circumscribed circumstances, like when the delivery is exceedingly “short” and you’ve already “got yourself in”.
Naturally, all of this sits in stark contrast to the instinctive way of batting for all kids, so one does have to be thoroughly drilled for the style to become even mildly comfortable. The consequence of this is that a lot of kids either forever reject the “corrective” instruction, or just never quite master the technique. In Kanga cricket, I think it was probably only a couple of kids who were getting the hang of it by the end of the season.
Personally, I have a hunch that what I intimated before about “proper technique” – namely, that it is no more efficient than any other method – might actually be more correct than most pundits realise. Indeed, what you find in the junior ranks of cricket is that the best athletes almost always find a way to succeed, no matter their technique. The only exception is when they are caught between the two worlds and are being forced to repress their natural instincts, like a Geordie in an elocution class. The important point is that there are definitely ways to succeed on hand-eye co-ordination alone, without all the trappings of the formal style. The traditionalists claim that it’s only in junior levels that the proper technique is unnecessary, since the slow and erratic bowling isn’t sufficient to expose deep flaws. However, there is ample evidence from all levels that proper technique isn’t necessary. Despite widespread inculcation into the proper technique, there have been plenty of truly great players at the highest levels with so-called “rubbish” techniques and yet more with “mediocre” ones. W.G. Grace’s graceless style looks nothing like today’s, Don Bradman had a strange and highly unorthodox method, Keith Miller was a flamboyant flayer, Garfield Sobers was a dashing slasher, Doug Walters was a maverick whacker, Viv Richards was a reckless wrecker, Allan Border was a dogged dragger, and in the modern era we can name countless great tonkers, hoikers, bashers, hackers, pounders, swingers, crabs and barnacles. Just to name a few, there’s the brilliant Brian Lara, the violent Virender Sehwag, the macho Matthew Hayden, the aggressive Adam Gilchrist, the callous Jacques Kallis, the shadowy Shivnarine Chanderpaul, the artful A.B. de Villiers, the dastardly David Warner and the vicious Virat Kohli. All the best T20 specialists obviously conform to the noncomforist category too. To name a few of these, there’s the masterful M.S. Dhoni, the eukinetic Yuvraj Singh, the catastrophic Chris Gayle, the cantankerous Kieron Pollard, the obstreperous Eoin Morgan, the showy Shaun Marsh and the shocking Shane Watson. Although test cricket is still regarded as the ultimate test of quality, it remains true that these batsmen are efficient in at least one form of the game – and that’s what matters when trying to distinguish between two methods.
Clearly, the proper technique has produced numerous great players, including in the modern era. Sachin Tendulkar had a model style, for example, and he even used it to score very fast (albeit with a massive bat). Moreover, England’s few great batsmen have all tended to use the proper technique (the world’s slowest and stodgiest batsman, Geoffrey Boycott, always adopted it, as does Alistair Cooke). Nevertheless, I still think it is evident that it’s overrated.
That was a long digression!      
Before I did Kanga, I don’t think I knew anything about cricket, and never watched the Australian team. After it, though, I was much more favourably disposed to the sport. And once you mastered the basics of the Kanga game, it really did become terrific fun to play. People say you spend most of the time in cricket just standing around like a scarecrow, twiddling your thumbs, twirling your hair, snapping your trousers – in short, frittering away the time and waiting for something to happen. Although this has a (very) significant element of truth to it, one of the great strengths of the sport at the egalitarian junior levels is that, in one single game, you will get to perform four distinct roles, each requiring its own set of unique skills. How exciting is that! Moreover, this diversity of opportunity essentially gives you four chances to succeed, alleviating any frustration you might feel after a failure at one role. After getting bowled first ball (known as getting a “golden duck”), you can merely shrug it off and say, “Perhaps I’ll succeed as wiki” (meaning “wicket keeper”). What a jolly sport! Top hole, what.
Now that I’m on the subject of sport, I suppose I should discharge a brief summary of my second season of soccer. During the 2003 season, I was in the 6Bs at Kissing Point, an upgrade from the year before (but in the same age division, because I was underaged and not brilliant). From memory, this season was much more enjoyable than my first, and I began to make some friends in it. Most of the team was made up of kids from Turramurra Public School, but I think Ryan Jones (the boy aforementioned) was also in it, and maybe someone else from Warrawee I can’t remember. I think I can accurately recall a few other people from the team, but I don’t think it’s worth listing their names.
Since I had already played a full season of soccer, I now felt much more accomplished and confident, and had a head-start on dribbling and the other important skills of the game. Indeed, if I’m not mistaken, one of the clearest memories I have of training in the dark at Auluba Oval comes from this season. We had been instructed to dribble to a fence and back as a warm-up and exhorted to use “both our feet” while doing so. I remember finding it very easy to fulfil this prescription of ambidexterity, and that gave me great pleasure.
It was probably this season that I discovered which positions I was best at, namely, left and right midfield. These were suited to me because I had a lot of natural stamina – I could run up and down the field all day – and I was pretty good at passing, but not that good at beating players with fancy dribbling, heading or booting the ball out from the back, or throwing myself into scary one-on-one clashes. Basically, my strength was as a kind of fit utility player, and this hasn’t really changed since then.
In this second season of soccer, I think we were a fairly good team, and this was one of the reasons why I found it so much more enjoyable than the first. We were so good, in fact, that on the Gala Day (the last, action-packed day of the season where the winner takes all (there are no league tables at lower age-divisions)), we actually won! Yes, we fucking won the competition. Admittedly, we didn’t win “Div 1”, because we were still a B team, but we were victors nonetheless. I still have my green Gala day medal from this year, along with all my other trophies.
Incidentally, now that we’re on the subject of trophies, I feel it’s a good time to mention a curious quirk of my trophy collection: the very first trophy I ever received, at the end of the under-6 Cs season, is far bigger than any of the others. At the time, I remember being so happy when that whopping great monument was bestowed upon me. It was just such a marvellous artefact, and I used to spend minutes on end just staring at the faux-metal homunculus, gazing in awe at his exemplary physique and pose, his magnificent grace and poise, and revelling in fantasies of my similarity to this man. Notably, when I compared this first trophy to the others, I remember also that I used to lament the increasing meanness of the club. Why did the world always have to change for the worse?  
Ironically, though, picking up a couple of my soccer trophies just now has convinced that they probably got less mean after 2002. How did I reach this conclusion, you ask. Well, despite being double the size of my other trophies, this first one is lighter! The later trophies were actually made out of some metal alloy and were slightly sturdier. This clearly would have increased production costs and thus forced a dramatic reduction in size. I’m not quite sure what a fiscally corrective size reduction would be, but it seems likely that the sizes of the later trophies were not less expensive than the first trophy. Indeed, they might very well have been more expensive, since the price relationship between plastic trophies and metal trophies surely must look like this:

Lexically represented, this conveys that the price relationship is a chasmic parallel correlation (there’s probably a technical term for this kind of graph that I’m not aware of, not having done any statistics). If you still have no idea what the heck I’m blabbering about, I mean to say that a plastic trophy is probably always going to be cheaper unless you reduce the size of the metal trophy to infinitesimal proportions, which would make no sense. If this hypothesis is true, it guarantees that Kissing Point Soccer Club (KPSC, for short) actually got less parsimonious and more generous after 2002.


Question: why do I waste my life doing these things?

Friday, 9 October 2015

Extract 6

Ants and Psychobabble:


The microworld of insects is a bit of an obsession for me. When I was a child, I would often spend hours on a Saturday or Sunday just staring at insects, particularly ants. I remember many a sunny day when I would go outside to be around my dad as he gardened, or washed the car, or did something in the garage, and just sit there on the driveway, in the baking heat, surveying the minuscule creatures.
The top section of our driveway, nearest the garage and our house, is a hard strip that has always been strewn with mottled leaves, little brown peduncles, invisibly bristled, painful yellow leaves and big, hard, furry flower buds. This arboreal detritus falls from two large trees that hang over and adumbrate (shade) the driveway. Strangely, until a few minutes ago, when I did some investigation in order to preclude descriptive error, I always thought this detritus came from just one tree. I now realise there is a simple reason for this error: when you look up from the top section of our driveway, you only see a complex 3-D network of polymorphous, tangled, unispecific branches. I know this network of branches to belong to the tree growing out of the garden bed adjacent to this top section of the driveway, approximately seven metres from the garage. I just tried to find the name of the species on Google by describing its appearance, but to no avail. Whatever it’s called, it has a hard, brown, relatively narrow, seemingly barkless trunk; dark green, ovate leaves; and big flowers which (as far as I’m aware) never blossom, instead just dropping their immature, hard, furry buds all over the driveway. Until just a few minutes ago, I always assumed that this tree was also responsible for both the invisible, bindi-like burrs that would penetrate into one’s sole and then lodge there, causing a nasty sting; and the club-like gumnuts and white-bellied leaves that also littered the drive. It turns out this was a false assumption. A combination of the internet and my own observations (more specifically, me deciding to look out onto the driveway through the window in my parents’ room) has led me to the conclusion that these other depositions come from the massive Turpentine tree whose trunk stands much farther away from the driveway, roughly aligned with the garage but a number of metres away, near the other edge of the garden bed and our isolated front lawn. One of the bigger arms of this immense and magnificent organism hangs over the driveway above the limbs of the smaller, aforedescribed tree. From below, this arrangement almost entirely disguises the driveway-hanging branches of the Turpentine, which explains my misconception.
While I’m on the subject, I should mention that we also have a massive and impressive Turpentine at the back of our house, behind our veranda, a few metres in front of the forest. The Syncarpia glomulifera is a very unusual and beautiful tree. A Hornsby Shire Council informational document I found on the internet testifies to this with its excellent description, resplendent with the lovely, Latinate language of botany: “A variable tree, often multi trunked from exposure to wildfire or if in proximity to closed forest a tall single trunked tree to over 25m, much taller outside of HSC (50m+). The trunk is covered in thick spongy bark in long fissured or stringy flaky strips extending to smaller branches. Foliage is dull green and very pale on the underside- white, often hairy, ovate to narrow-ovate, 7–11 cm long, 2.5–4.5 cm wide. Leaves are often parasitised by moth larvae giving a pimpled appearance. They are oppositely arranged in pairs and often crowed into whorls at the end of branchlets, thick and stiff in texture. Peak flowering reliably occurs in October inflorescences are arranged prominently in clustered heads at the ends of branches. Fruit are a woody aggregate persisting on the tree for several years.”
Below the layer of botanical degradables, the driveway is traversed by veins of some kind of hard, black sealant. I remember these veins were often filled with dirt and moss, and that ants had made many holes in this soft matter.
Ants are constantly moving. They are tiny little robot things that just scurry around like mad, constantly. Have you ever thought about an ant’s mind? How does it work? What’s it like to be an ant? How do they make decisions? I used to think these thoughts as I watched them scurrying and darting, dashing along the superhighways, or carrying little white particles into their holes, or just moving. They were always moving. Always guided by some sense we humans have no access to, and always with a purpose, whether it be some crumb or morsel, or the communication of a signal of danger. Have you ever noticed how quickly ants can transmit a signal of danger? One touches another and another touches another, and then there’s rapid cascade, and soon they’re all scurrying about like mad, all in a complete frenzy, a panic. All is chaos. The pattern of ants changes in an instant, a bit like when you rotate a toy kaleidoscope and the crystals instantaneously arrange themselves into a brilliant, architectonic form. It’s kind of beautiful the way the ant dynamics would so rapidly shift, though eerie.
Ant nests are arranged in really elaborate networks. I used to trace the paths of ants, and they would just lead you on endlessly. You’d never stop. From one ant hole to another, to another. You could follow the ants for metres and metres and metres if you wanted to. I did always want to. There was something so mesmerising about it.
One time, much more recently, when I was in year 11, I was with my family camping on this grassy, overly suburban-looking campsite at Yengo National Park. My half-nieces had been there, and I had spent much of the time playing with them. But I also did some fairly childish things myself. Indeed, since I had lots of downtime, I spent much of the trip staring at the multitudinous ants that covered the ground. At one point, I decided to see how far I could follow an ant on a journey, to see where it would finish up, whether at another ant hole or what. I remember just walking along as this one ant scurried through the grass, periodically disappearing from sight. It was hard to keep track of him, but I made sure to keep following at least some ant near him along the highway for as long as it would take me. The highway took me to one giant ant hill, then another, and soon I found myself wandering into the bush. Yet another hill appeared. The infinity of the network reminded me of the world wide web. It seemed as if all of these little ants in Australia might be connected. Of course, once I was in the bush, I had to stop following the highways, but it was a fascinating discovery. And I couldn’t stop thinking about the ants. So many ants! How could you fail to be entranced by all these tiny, complex, beguiling creatures all around you?
I think it’s fair to say that not many people are that interested in ants, or at staring at bugs in general. But I know for myself it’s a profound pleasure, if a frustrating one, because when I’m doing it I’m constantly aware of how nobody else understands the magic of staring at bugs. When I was a child, thankfully, I don’t think I was nearly so self-aware.
Seriously, though, how can you fail to be amazed by the exciting world happening around you on the level of the really small? There is an entire world going on there, entirely independent of you. Black ants, bull ants, Daddy Long Legs, Funnel-webs, cockroaches, worms, Christmas beetles, citrus bugs, slaters, snails. These are living things, and they’re wonderful to watch, dancing in their intricate ballet, caught up in their manic little lives, forever on the move. And always totally oblivious to you as you now bring down your giant hand and manipulate the world. Here’s a leaf, now it’s gone. Why don’t I try to pick you up onto this leaf? Climb onto it, you fool!  
Of course, as a child, I never did leave the world of the insects alone. It was never a passive experience, being with the ants or the bugs. Instead, it was a bit like playing with toys. I was their God, and I could do anything I wanted.
Regrettably, I remember being something of an Old Testament God.
One example of this was my behaviour towards the citrus bugs that used to live in our garden. Many years ago, we had an infestation of that species around the front of our house. They were these slender, pretty, red bugs that spent their time scuttling about and eating leaves. They also seemed to mate very often. The way they did this was to join up to one another via their bottom, thereby essentially making themselves an extra-long, bicorporeal chain, with heads at either end, a bit like Catdog. For some reason, I was obsessed not with killing these creatures, but splitting them. Every time I saw a couple, I would smite it. Over and over again. I was a divorce mogul, a magnate of misery. It gave me great pleasure. The power was really intoxicating.
At other times, my dad would be washing the car or otherwise using the hose, and there would be rivulets of water running down the driveway, collecting debris. I knew then that an enthralling spectacle was imminent. I’d watch as the ants were taken by the irresistible flood, swept up in its inexorable advance, carried rapidly down the driveway until the water hit an organic wall of some kind, maybe a clump of dirt and some leaves, or a gumnut, or whatever. I would often try to remove the obstacle, or try to direct the flow of the water in other ways. I can’t tell you how fun it was.
Another time, I remember attacking the veins of dirt into which the ant holes were drilled. I would dig at them with my fingernails, pulling up giant clumps of dirt, and just watch as the ants ran around in bewilderment and horror, their entire home obliterated, everything they had ever known gone.
When water was involved, I remember wondering if being in that flood was, for an ant, a little like being in a swimming pool for us. After all, the depth of the water seemed roughly commensurate. Obviously, though, unlike a human in a swimming pool, the ants were not having a good time. They always seemed to be in a state of terror. Indeed, it was like their entire life was terror, and I was just crouching above them, playing with their world, deified, magnificent, and yet myself also so small.
It’s hard really to capture how profound and epochal this all used to be for me, and seems to be now. It’s impossible to convey the silence and stillness of the experience, the serenity of it, the sense I always had when I was out with these insects that the world was just unfathomably immense and unfathomably wonderful – far greater than either of us could comprehend. Even just one individual session of doing this contained more wonder and mystery than anything that I could possibly articulate, and I have tried to summarise my entire life of staring at the miniature in a few pages! It’s almost heretical. And I keep resorting to the same literary technique here: long, sprawling, asyndetonic sentences interposed with short, fractured ones. I’ve found myself doing thing many times before when trying to sound really deep.  But none of this ever quite works. Words cannot capture the immensity of what I am trying to say. I guess it is more a feeling than anything – though even that doesn’t seem quite right. It seems to be one of those things that resists rational analysis, and probably couldn’t survive it. Indeed, the fundamental problem with trying to state any of this non-mystically is that the profundity immediately dissolves. It’s like the feeling or thought or enigmatic, ineffable thing – whatever it is – just kind of vanishes. But I will beat on now, with more mysticism.
Do you know the infinite time of childhood? How on certain days, everything seemed so still, how the world seemed so stable and static and fixed? How everything was so slow? Do you remember the indescribable boredom you felt? The sense that there would be time for everything? It was literal hours that I used to spend staring at the ants, hours would pass with the sun warming my back, my heart beating, my blood flowing, my synapses firing, my toes curling, my muscles stirring. The ants were moving all the time. Everything was alive. It seemed as if things would never end, like I would forever be the age I was then, like nothing ever changed except the insects on the ground and my body. It’s impossible to explain. I feel like this is psychobabble, and has to be psychobabble. But it feels really profound. I know other people know what I’m talking about, because people often try to say profound things about the weirdness of childhood from the benighted perspective of maturity, even if they so often fail and sound trite and clichĂ©. And I don’t know how to do it. But I can see myself sitting there in the sun on an endless, turgid Sunday afternoon, and I can see the air around me flowing by my cheeks, and I can see the insects dancing in front of me, and there seems to be such a purity to me in that moment that I can’t explain, some kind of exquisite unself-consciousness as I gazed upon a beautiful thing, as the world spun round on its axis on some specific date, 60,000 years after my ancestors left Africa, 540 million years after the Cambrian explosion, 13.8 billion years after the start of the universe, and I had no sense of any of this, or anything at all, and all was just still.